master-cooks | Why Is Olestra Banned In Europe But Not The US?

Olestra, a fat substitute used in low-calorie snacks, is banned in Europe but remains available in the United States due to differing regulatory approaches and health concerns. In the 1990s, Olestra was introduced in the U.S. as a way to reduce fat and calorie content in foods like chips and crackers. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it for use, emphasizing its ability to help consumers reduce dietary fat intake without sacrificing taste. However, concerns arose over Olestra's side effects, particularly its tendency to cause gastrointestinal issues such as cramping and diarrhea. Additionally, it was found to inhibit the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins and nutrients. In contrast, European regulators opted for a more precautionary approach. The European Union, prioritizing consumer safety, decided against approving Olestra due to these reported side effects and potential nutritional impacts. The general regulatory philosophy in Europe tends to be more cautious, often placing the burden of proof on manufacturers to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new food additives. Consequently, Olestra was never permitted for use in European food products, reflecting a broader trend of differing food safety standards and cultural attitudes towards food regulation between Europe and the United States.

Is olestra as bad as it seems?

Despite the discontinuation of Lay's Light chips in 2016 and the gradual reduction of olestra's use, questions linger about its safety and why the FDA did not ban it, unlike the EU and Canada. After the FDA initially approved olestra, Michael F. Jacobson, the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, expressed concerns to The Washington Post that the additive could lead to gastrointestinal issues and potentially cancer over time. In response, FDA Commissioner David Kessler defended olestra, asserting that it was safe and that any related problems "may be bothersome to some individuals," but emphasized that the additive would not have received approval if any safety issues had been identified.

In 1997, the University of Connecticut conducted a review of studies concerning gastrointestinal side effects and concluded that olestra did not cause any pathological changes in bowel function, although issues were more likely to arise with excessive consumption. A few years later, in 1999, a double-blind study involving 3,181 participants was carried out. In this study, 1,620 individuals consumed snacks containing olestra, while a control group of 1,561 received a placebo. The results indicated that cramping and diarrhea were similar in both groups, with the placebo group actually reporting more symptoms. Such findings contributed to the FDA's determination that olestra did not require a ban.

So, what’s the reality? Unlike the popular Kinder Surprise eggs, which the FDA deemed a choking hazard, the effects of olestra appear to be dose-dependent. Currently, olestra is allowed in ready-to-eat savory snacks and unpopped popcorn. However, to counteract its interference with vitamin absorption, all products containing olestra must be fortified with vitamins A, D, E, and K. That said, you might be better off making your own potato chips and avoiding additives altogether.

Why Is Olestra Banned In Europe But Not The US?

Is olestra as bad as it seems?

Recommended

Next up